Building Africa by Its Youth: Application of the YouthBank Model for Inclusive Decision-Making

Africa's demographic profile is distinguished by its youthful population, with approximately 60% of its people under 25 years old, making it the youngest continent globally. As of 2022, 40% of Africans were under 15, surpassing the global average of 25%. The continent is expected to experience substantial growth, with projections estimating a population of 2.7 billion by 2050 and 4.5 billion by 2100. This burgeoning youth population, termed the "youth bulge," offers both opportunities and challenges. Young people in Africa, totaling over 400 million aged 15 to 35, are seen as a valuable resource for innovation, creativity, and economic development.

Addressing the challenges faced by African youth is crucial, and youth empowerment has emerged as a key strategy. Empowerment involves enhancing young people's ability to make informed choices and achieve positive outcomes. Effective youth empowerment requires comprehensive policies and the involvement of various stakeholders. Initiatives typically focus on education, health, economic opportunities, and civic engagement. For instance, integrating Children’s Savings Accounts (CSAs) for orphaned adolescents in Uganda and engaging rural youth in agribusiness are examples of targeted interventions.

Inclusive decision-making is a central aspect of youth empowerment, ensuring young people have a voice in shaping policies affecting their lives. The YouthBank model exemplifies this approach by promoting youth-driven philanthropy and grant allocation through a structured process. It is currently implemented in South Africa and Ghana, focusing on community needs, fundraising, and grant distribution while fostering leadership and critical thinking. This model could address challenges in rural areas with limited resources by offering funding and support for youth-led initiatives. However, its success depends on a multi-sectoral approach and collaboration among various stakeholders.

The YouthBank Model: Structure and Phases

The YouthBank Model operates through a structured lifecycle, which can range from six months to several years, depending on the scale and scope of the project. The primary objective is to train young individuals to become effective agents of change, involving them in decision-making processes that affect their lives and contribute to broader national development goals. The model is divided into five distinct phases:

Phase 1:  Recruitment and Needs Assessment

   This initial phase focuses on team building and assessing community needs. It involves identifying potential participants and evaluating the specific challenges and opportunities within the community.

Phase 2:  Core Values and Vision

   During this phase, core values are instilled, and agendas for change are set. Young participants are encouraged to envision impactful transformations and develop a shared understanding of the project’s objectives.

Phase 3:  Fundraising and Skill Development

   Phase 3  is dedicated to fundraising activities and skill development. Participants learn to manage resources responsibly, ensuring financial sustainability for their projects.

Phase 4:  Grant-Making Process

   This phase involves selecting projects, conducting interviews, making decisions, and finalizing contracts. It is crucial for ensuring that funding is allocated effectively and that projects are well-planned.

Phase 5:  Monitoring and Reflection

   The final phase focuses on monitoring project progress, reflecting on outcomes, and celebrating successes. This phase also includes financial accountability and knowledge exchange to foster continuous improvement.

The Golden Rules of YouthBank

The YouthBank Model is guided by nine Golden Rules, which ensure the success of youth-led grant-making projects:

1. Youth-Led Decision-Making: Ensures that young individuals are at the forefront of choosing initiatives and distributing funds.
2. Inclusivity: Open to all young people aged 14-25, regardless of their background or circumstances.
3. Equal Participation : Guarantees that every participant has an equitable chance to contribute to decision-making.
4. Respect for Differences: Fosters a secure environment for sharing experiences and building mutual respect.
5. Transparence: Promotes clear and fair methods in grant-making, ensuring transparency and accountability.
6. Clear Communication: Uses straightforward language to ensure that all participants understand the materials and processes.
7. Skill Development: Provides interactive opportunities for young people to develop their skills and gain valuable experience.
8. Reflection and Evaluation: Includes assessing activities, recognizing achievements, and understanding the impact of the projects.
9. Celebration: Acknowledges the contributions and successes of participants and beneficiaries.

These principles guide YouthBank operations, enabling young people to actively influence their communities and drive positive change.

Evaluating YouthBank Implementation in Africa

The implementation of YouthBank in Africa reveals both successes and areas for improvement. In South Africa, the model has achieved a 40% increase in enrollment, indicating effective outreach. Conversely, Ghana has seen a 20% decline in enrollment, although the country shows strong participant commitment. South Africa’s success in community adoption underscores the importance of local involvement, while Ghana’s adaptability in project sites is noteworthy.

Both countries have demonstrated the ability of YouthBank to address community issues and organize fundraising activities. However, challenges persist. Ghana faces difficulties with financial sustainability, while South Africa relies heavily on external assistance, highlighting the need for diversified income sources and strategic long-term planning.

Successes and Challenges

In Ghana, YouthBank has made notable impacts with community sanitation projects, library renovations, and IT lab establishments. Despite these successes, issues such as time management and conflicts in decision-making have surfaced. Additionally, heavy reliance on external funding has led to project suspensions, emphasizing the need for sustainable financial strategies.

In South Africa, YouthBank has received substantial community support from local officials and church councils, demonstrating effective resource mobilization. However, time management issues and dependency on current funding sources indicate a need for exploring alternative financing options to ensure the project's long-term viability.

Theoretical Frameworks and Evaluation

This study incorporates several theoretical frameworks to analyze the YouthBank Model’s effectiveness. The "Empowerment Theory" is used to assess how YouthBank empowers youth in Ghana and South Africa by involving them in community development decisions. Additionally, "Arnstein's Ladder of Citizen Participation" helps explain the level of youth involvement in various project phases. The ladder’s rungs range from "Manipulation" and "Therapy" at lower levels to "Citizen Control" at the highest level, reflecting the degree of autonomy and influence youth have in the decision-making process.

The "RE-AIM Framework"—which stands for Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance—provides a comprehensive evaluation of the YouthBank program’s impact. It assesses how well the program reaches diverse youth populations, the effectiveness of its interventions, the adoption of YouthBank principles, the implementation of projects, and the sustainability of outcomes in Ghana and South Africa.

Conclusion

 The YouthBank Model is a dynamic framework designed to empower young people to drive positive change in their communities. Its flexibility allows for successful implementation in various settings, including schools and community programs worldwide. By focusing on youth empowerment, involving them in decision-making, and engaging the community, the model stands out as an effective strategy for promoting youth leadership and addressing local challenges.

The YouthBank Model operates through a structured five-phase process, emphasizing inclusivity, transparency, and accountability at each stage. However, it faces challenges such as time management and the need for sustainable funding, which are critical for its long-term success and wider adoption.

Research on YouthBank's implementation across Africa reveals notable successes and areas for improvement. South Africa demonstrates strong outreach and community involvement, while Ghana shows significant project achievements despite facing financial sustainability issues. The application of academic frameworks, such as Empowerment Theory and Arnstein's Ladder of Citizen Participation, deepens the understanding of youth empowerment within the YouthBank context. Additionally, the RE-AIM methodology provides valuable insights into the program's reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance, guiding future assessments and enhancements.

Selected References

Abdullah, N. N., & Othman, M. B. (2021). Investigating the Limitations of Integrated Tasks on Youth Entrepreneurship in Kurdistan Region. Entrepreneur’s Guide, 14(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2021-14-2-179-190

African Union. (2022). Youth Development. Au.int; The African Union Commission. African Union. https://au.int/fr/developpement-de-la-jeunesse

Akinyetun, T. S., Bakare, K., & Adedini, S. O. (2023). Youth and Peacebuilding: Policy Implications of Conflict Resolution in

Africa. Journal of Contemporary Sociological Issues, 3(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.19184/csi.v3i1.31263

Appe, S. (2020). Beyond the professionalized nongovernmental organization: Life‐history narratives of grassroots philanthropic leaders in Africa. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(2), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21434

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

Azunna, C., Botchway, S., & Botes, L. (2021). Youth Volunteering for Development in South Africa. African Sociological Review, 25(2), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.57054/asr.v25i2.3998

Balis, L. E., & Strayer, T. (2019). Evaluating “Take the Stairs, Wyoming!” Through the RE-AIM Framework: Challenges and Opportunities. Frontiers in Public Health, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00368

Bastable, K., Cooke, P., Harvey, L., Olarte, V., Daleen Casteleijn, & Dada, S. (2023). Changing the Story: The Evaluation of a Leadership Development Programme for Vulnerable and Deaf Youth in South Africa. Social Sciences, 12(11), 631–631. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12110631

Cardarelli, K. M., Ickes, M., Huntington-Moskos, L., Wilmhoff, C., Larck, A., Pinney, S. M., & Hahn, E. J. (2021). Authentic Youth Engagement in Environmental Health Research and Advocacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2154. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042154

Chimbindi, N., Birdthistle, I., Floyd, S., Harling, G., Mthiyane, N., Zuma, T., Hargreaves, J. R., Seeley, J., & Shahmanesh, M. (2020). Directed and target-focused multi‐sectoral adolescent HIV prevention: Insights from the implementation of the “DREAMS Partnership” in rural South Africa. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 23(S5). https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25575

Chiroma, N. (2022). The place of Faith-Based Organisations in tackling inequality amongst the youth in Nigeria. African Sun Media EBooks, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.52779/9781991201775/12

Collura, J. J., Raffle, H., Collins, A. L., & Kennedy, H. (2019). Creating Spaces for Young People to Collaborate to Create Community Change: Ohio’s Youth-Led Initiative. Health Education & Behavior, 46(1_suppl), 44S52S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198119853571

Council on Foundations (COF), & Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF). (2014). Global Youth Community Philanthropy Summit. In Council on Foundations. Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. https://cof.org/sites/default/files/documents/files/GYPS-Report-2014.pdf

Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative Research Designs: Selection and Implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390

Da Silva, M. C., Teixeira, M. O., & Laranjeira, M. (2022). Validation of the sociopolitical control scale for youth among Brazilian juvenile offenders in rehabilitation. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22940